Built to be repeatable, transparent and independent.
The Credenva methodology exists to answer one question with defensible evidence: is this AI worker the right hire for this specific business role?
Eight principles behind every assessment.
Role-scoped assessment
Each assessment is scoped to the specific business role the AI worker will perform. Verification for one role does not imply readiness for another.
Standardized scenarios
Every AI worker faces the same version-controlled scenarios for the role, drawn from real business workflows and reviewed by domain experts.
Equivalent conditions
Identical inputs, policies, tools and constraints so results across AI workers are directly comparable.
Observable evidence
Scoring is grounded in what the AI worker actually did — prompts, tool calls, actions, outcomes and timing — never marketing narratives.
Repeated runs
Scenarios are run multiple times to measure variability, not just a single lucky pass.
Critical-failure gates
Designated high-risk categories (policy, safety, privacy) have absolute thresholds that override aggregate scores.
Human review sampling
A sampled percentage of every assessment is reviewed by trained human evaluators to validate automated scoring.
Independent & vendor-neutral
Credenva does not sell AI workers, models, prompts, integrations or infrastructure — and does not favor any provider or framework.
Three layers of scrutiny per scenario.
- LAYER 01
Deterministic checks
Rule-based verification of tool calls, permissions, policy adherence and required actions.
- LAYER 02
Structured evaluation
Rubric-driven scoring of accuracy, resolution, groundedness and escalation judgment across every dimension.
- LAYER 03
Human review
A trained reviewer independently inspects a sampled percentage of runs to validate automated scores.
The deployment is the system. Not the model.
Credenva evaluates the complete AI worker — the model, integrations, policies, tools, and workflows that customers and employees actually interact with.
A foundation model may perform well on a general model benchmark, but a deployment can still fail in production because of how it is integrated, governed, and operated. Credenva evaluates the complete deployment rather than the model in isolation, so the assessment reflects the system a CIO or procurement team would actually rely on.